May be the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is a fantastic alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it normally as you want and never have to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s great for kids and for parties because you can serve.
Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, which was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Because of this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so when they only need to take with you the small product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert that allows one to put it into your mouth, this means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also has an extinguisher it is also in violation of regulations. The reason being that since there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke another one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming that they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. Besides sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer refer to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco into the marketplace.
As well as the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of vapinger.com flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially decrease the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not supply them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government could have a point. There’s currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning labels on their products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which in turn means that fewer people will purchase them.